Original Message:

 

> Your uploads are

> good material

> mostly.

>

> But how

> do you have

> no-planers

> as friends?

 

 

Actually I don't - the only link is that I was interviewed on Webster Tarpley's radio show back in March of 2006 immediately following Nico Haupt.  Haupt is a very odd character and was running on about nano-machines and other off-the-wall stuff that I could not make sense of.  Though I had been asked to appear on the same show as Haupt I did not know hat he would be appearing, and had no intent of endorsing his ideas.

 

He seemed to be claiming that the apparent planes that hit the towers were made up of swarms of flying nano-bots that could assume any shape they wanted (really, I'm not making this up), and kept making nonsensical claims about the availability of nano-technology that could actually do this. 

 

Tarply had asked me on the show specifically to discuss possible use of "black budget" technologies, and at the time I did not see any “conventional” way to explain things like the ablation of steel during the collapses (those thick dust trails) and the presence of molten steel weeks later.  Though I still think that something more than conventional high-explosive cutting charges must have been used, I am coming to think that advanced micro-nukes can explain all these anomalies without having to invoke technologies that are not publicly known to exist.  The presence of continued hot spots is nicely explained by the existence of "pockets of criticality" from unexploded or misfired devices that continued to generate high temperatures and fine dust particles.

 

"Anonymous Physicist" summarizes the evidence and makes a good case for nukes here:

http://wtcdemolition.blogspot.com/2007/05/wtc-nuke-thesis-from-anonymous.html

 

 

Regards,

 

Jeff King